The Ultimate Guide

New Zealand VS Australian Manuka Honey

Manuka Honey Nov 26, 24
Reading time: 9 minutes
The Ultimate Guide: New Zealand VS Australian Manuka Honey
Disclaimer:

Information in this article shouldn't be considered medical advice. If you are considering taking manuka honey, propolis, royal jelly or bee pollen for their health benefits and are currently taking medication, please consult your doctor first.

Key Highlights:

Manuka honey is a globally celebrated natural product, but significant differences exist between the varieties produced in New Zealand and Australia. New Zealand Manuka honey, derived exclusively from the Leptospermum scoparium plant, benefits from the country’s pristine environment, Māori cultural stewardship, and rigorous quality assurance through the internationally recognised UMF certification. These factors ensure a consistent, premium product with scientifically validated health benefits.

In contrast, Australia’s "Manuka" honey, historically known as Jelly Bush honey, comes from various Leptospermum species and lacks the same level of quality control. While efforts have been made to improve its reputation, inconsistent testing standards and environmental challenges have hindered its ability to match New Zealand’s product in potency and reliability.

The ongoing trademark disputes over the use of the term "Manuka Honey" highlight New Zealand’s commitment to protecting its honey’s authenticity and reputation, further solidifying its status as the gold standard in the global market. Ethical production practices and sustainable beekeeping in New Zealand also reinforce consumer trust, ensuring the product is not only beneficial for health but also environmentally responsible.

Ultimately, for discerning consumers seeking a honey that delivers unmatched quality, proven health benefits, and a strong ethical foundation, New Zealand Manuka honey remains the clear choice. It’s a true testament to the country’s natural resources, cultural heritage, and dedication to excellence.

Manuka honey has garnered global acclaim for its unique flavour and remarkable health benefits. However, not all Manuka honey is created equal. A significant distinction exists between New Zealand's authentic Manuka honey and Australia's variant, formerly known as Jelly Bush honey. This article delves into their origins, testing standards, legal disputes, and other pertinent factors, ultimately highlighting why New Zealand's Manuka honey stands as the superior choice.

Inside this article about: NZ and Australian Manuka Honey Differences


The Origins New Zealand vs Australia

New Zealand’s Rich Heritage

New Zealand Manuka honey originates from the nectar of the Leptospermum scoparium plant , which is indigenous to New Zealand. This species thrives in the country’s pristine, temperate environment, nurtured by fertile soil and minimal pollution. The honey produced from this plant is renowned for its high-quality, bioactive properties, a result of both the plant’s unique characteristics and the rigorous production processes adhered to in New Zealand.

Māori communities, who have a long history of using Manuka for its medicinal properties, have significantly contributed to preserving and sharing knowledge about the plant’s benefits. Their cultural practices have further ensured sustainable harvesting methods, protecting the plant and the environment in which it grows.

Australia’s Jelly Bush Beginnings

Australia’s honey, produced from various Leptospermum species, lacks the botanical specificity of New Zealand’s Manuka. Historically referred to as "Jelly Bush Honey," this product faced challenges due to its thicker texture and less palatable taste, which did not appeal to global consumers. While Australia has rebranded its honey under the "Manuka" label, the diversity of Leptospermum species across the continent leads to inconsistencies in taste and quality.

This foundational difference in origin sets the stage for the variations in quality and reputation between the two products, further explored in their testing standards and global acceptance.


Environmental Factors Influencing Manuka Honey Quality

New Zealand’s Unique Geography and Climate

New Zealand's diverse geography and pristine environments create ideal conditions for the Leptospermum scoparium plant, commonly known as the Manuka bush. Regions such as Northland, East Cape, Wairarapa, and Taranaki each offer unique soil compositions and microclimates that significantly influence the characteristics of Manuka honey produced there. These variations contribute to the honey's distinct taste profiles and bioactive properties, underscoring the importance of terroir in honey production.

Australia’s Diverse Environmental Conditions

In contrast, Australia's vast landscapes host multiple Leptospermum species across varied climates and soil types. This diversity leads to inconsistencies in the flavour and medicinal qualities of the honey produced. The lack of a singular, dominant Manuka species and the wide-ranging environmental conditions make it challenging to achieve the uniformity found in New Zealand's Manuka honey.

Research and Development New Zealand’s Leadership

Over the past three decades, scientific investigations into the health benefits of Manuka honey have predominantly focused on samples sourced from New Zealand. This extensive research has established a robust foundation of evidence supporting the therapeutic properties of New Zealand Manuka honey, including its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects. The consistent focus on New Zealand's product has set a global benchmark for quality and efficacy, enhancing consumer trust and credibility.

In comparison, Australian Manuka honey has not been the subject of equivalent scientific scrutiny. The limited research on Australian variants means there is less empirical support for their health claims, making it difficult for consumers to assess their therapeutic value accurately.


Regulatory Frameworks and Sustainability Practices

New Zealand’s Rigorous Standards

New Zealand enforces strict regulations governing the harvesting and production of Manuka honey to ensure sustainability and product integrity. Beekeepers must comply with guidelines set by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI), which include obtaining permits for honey collection and adhering to sustainable harvesting practices. These measures protect Manuka bush populations from overexploitation and promote the conservation of native habitats, thereby supporting biodiversity.

Australia’s Regulatory Approach

Australia has made efforts to manage Manuka bush populations sustainably and minimise the environmental impact of honey production. However, the regulatory framework is less stringent compared to New Zealand's. The absence of comprehensive, nationwide standards can lead to variability in production practices and product quality, potentially affecting consumer confidence.


Commercial Production and Grading Systems

New Zealand’s Established Practices

In New Zealand, commercial production of Manuka honey involves strategic placement of hives in remote, Manuka-rich areas during the flowering season. The honey is harvested with minimal processing to preserve its natural properties. The Unique Manuka Factor (UMF) grading system is employed to assess the honey's quality and potency, providing consumers with a reliable measure of its therapeutic value.

Australia’s Production Methods

Australian producers have adopted similar practices , positioning hives in regions abundant with Leptospermum species to collect nectar. However, the lack of a unified, rigorous grading system like New Zealand's UMF means that the quality and potency of Australian Manuka honey can vary significantly between producers. This inconsistency poses challenges for consumers seeking assurance of the honey's efficacy.

In summary, New Zealand's Manuka honey benefits from a combination of favourable environmental conditions, extensive scientific research, stringent regulatory oversight, and established production and grading practices. These factors collectively contribute to its reputation as a superior and reliable product in the global market.


Genetic Distinctions New Insights into Mānuka Variations

Recent research has unveiled significant genetic differences between New Zealand and Australian mānuka plants . A study by Plant and Food Research analysed 2000 variable DNA markers, known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), from Leptospermum scoparium specimens in both regions. The
findings revealed strong genetic differentiation of over 50%,
suggesting that the Tasmanian populations are genetically distinct from New Zealand's. This evidence supports the recognition of the Tasmanian populations as an endemic Australian species separate from L. scoparium , which should be considered endemic to New Zealand.

These genetic distinctions have significant implications for the authenticity and labelling of mānuka honey. They reinforce the argument that true mānuka honey, derived from Leptospermum scoparium , is unique to New Zealand. This research bolsters New Zealand's position in trademark discussions, aiming to protect the mānuka honey name and ensure consumers receive genuine products. The study also highlights the importance of preserving the cultural and ecological heritage associated with New Zealand's mānuka.


Testing and Certification Why New Zealand Sets the Standard

New Zealand’s Rigorous UMF Certification

New Zealand’s Manuka honey undergoes strict testing under the Unique Manuka Factor (UMF™) certification, an internationally recognised standard that ensures quality and authenticity. This system measures key bioactive compounds, including MGO (Methylglyoxal), DHA (Dihydroxyacetone), and leptosperin, which contribute to the honey’s antibacterial properties. Each batch of honey is independently tested to guarantee it meets the stringent UMF requirements, providing consumers with confidence in the product’s potency and purity.

UMF certification not only validates the honey’s medicinal properties but also ensures it is free from adulteration, confirming its monofloral status. Monofloral Manuka honey, made predominantly from the nectar of Leptospermum scoparium , has significantly higher bioactivity than multifloral honey.

Australia’s Inconsistent Testing Methods

Unlike New Zealand, Australia does not adhere to a unified, internationally recognised certification system. While some producers conduct MGO testing, there is no standardised or independent verification process equivalent to the UMF grading system. This inconsistency means Australian honey may vary widely in quality, making it harder for consumers to determine its therapeutic effectiveness.


The Trademark Dispute

The term "Manuka Honey" has become synonymous with premium, medicinal-grade honey, but its use has been at the centre of a heated trademark dispute between New Zealand and Australia . In the early 2010s, New Zealand producers sought to trademark "Manuka Honey" internationally, asserting that the name refers to honey derived specifically from the Leptospermum scoparium plant, which is native to New Zealand.

Australian producers, however, argued that various Leptospermum species grow in Australia, making their honey equally deserving of the "Manuka" name. They contended that the term "Manuka" is generic and not exclusive to New Zealand. Despite this, New Zealand producers maintain that the Māori word "Mānuka" signifies a deep cultural and geographical connection to New Zealand.

Impact on Consumer Trust

New Zealand’s proactive legal efforts highlight its commitment to preserving the integrity of Manuka Honey. This dedication reassures consumers that when they purchase New Zealand Manuka Honey, they are investing in a product backed by robust quality controls and a well-established reputation. In contrast, Australia’s inability to trademark "Manuka Honey" has left its products more vulnerable to scrutiny and scepticism in international markets.

This legal distinction plays a pivotal role in why New Zealand Manuka Honey stands out as the superior choice, a point further reinforced by its environmental and ethical practices.


Consumer Perspective Why New Zealand Manuka Honey Is the Right Choice

Taste and Texture

New Zealand Manuka Honey is celebrated for its smooth, creamy texture and rich, robust flavour. These sensory qualities stem from the single-source nectar of the Leptospermum scoparium plant and the meticulous production standards maintained in New Zealand. This honey offers a consistent taste profile that balances natural sweetness with subtle earthy undertones, making it a favourite for both culinary and medicinal uses.

In contrast, Australian Manuka Honey often varies in taste and texture due to the diversity of Leptospermum species. Its texture is sometimes described as thicker or grittier, and the flavour can range from overly sweet to slightly bitter, reflecting inconsistencies in production and plant variety.

Proven Health Benefits

New Zealand’s UMF™-certified Manuka Honey has been extensively studied for its health benefits. Its high levels of MGO and Leptospermum give it potent antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. Scientific research supports its use in:

  • Wound healing and skin care.
  • Improving digestive health by combating harmful bacteria like Helicobacter pylori .
  • Boosting immunity and alleviating sore throats.

Australia’s honey, while containing some beneficial properties, has not been as rigorously studied or validated. Without a unified testing system, consumers cannot reliably confirm the therapeutic potential of Australian honey.

Read more: Manuka Honey Health Benefits


Reputation and Trust

New Zealand Manuka Honey dominates the global market, a testament to its reputation for quality and trustworthiness. Leading brands, including those certified by the UMF Honey Association, have earned consumer confidence through transparency and consistency.

In contrast, Australia’s lack of unified certification and its history with Jelly Bush Honey has created lingering scepticism. While some producers aim to compete in the premium honey market, the absence of a trusted standard like UMF has hindered Australia’s ability to match New Zealand’s reputation.

For discerning buyers seeking a product that embodies quality, consistency, and genuine health benefits, New Zealand Manuka Honey remains the top choice. The next section will tie together the key reasons why New Zealand Manuka Honey is the undisputed champion.


New Zealand Manuka Honey stands apart due to its unique origins, rigorous testing, cultural stewardship, and unparalleled consumer trust. Whether it’s the rich taste, scientifically proven health benefits, or ethical production practices, New Zealand consistently delivers a premium product that outshines its Australian counterpart.

For those seeking a honey that prioritises quality, authenticity, and wellness, the choice is clear. By choosing Manuka South, you’re not only investing in your health but also embracing a product that represents the pinnacle of New Zealand’s natural and cultural heritage. Experience the difference with our UMF™-certified Manuka Honey – the ultimate gift of health.